KS: MY WIFE’S (ALSO MY) FEMALE SUPREMACIST IDEOLOGY

(Note from Thomas Lavalle: Readers of this blog may recall an earlier guest post by KS (in March of 2024), THE ADDICTION OF SERVING WOMEN. So impressed was I by that offering, that I have been persistently after him for more. I am delighted to announce that he has finally agreed, and doubly delighted that it is, IMHO, one of the finest pieces of writing on Female Supremacy (and male inferiority) that I have ever read, let alone had the privilege of publishing. The credit, KS explains, is due to his superior wife, while the long lapse since his earlier guest-posting is, in large part, due to the fact that she is extremely demanding of his service to her.)

KS: In this post, I introduce my wife’s female supremacist philosophy. It is impossible to fully present her views in a short article, but I will do my best. If you find flaws in her philosophy, that is due to my limitations as a writer who cannot fully comprehend and convey her ideas. If anyone is to blame, it is I, not she. I honestly believe my wife is one of the smartest human beings in the world. I am lucky to be both her husband and her disciple, having learned from her profound philosophy over many years of marriage. Her philosophy, in a nutshell, is as follows:

Compatibility of Feminism and Female Supremacy 

My wife and I are both feminists. We support various feminist organizations and participate in feminist events. At the same time, we are firm believers in female supremacy—we believe that women are inherently superior to men. Some argue that feminism and female supremacy are contradictory, that one cannot be both a feminist and a female supremacist. But we strongly disagree.

We believe one can be both, because feminism is a social movement, while female supremacy is a natural fact about men and women. You cannot change a natural fact, just as you cannot change the fact that the Earth is round. Female supremacy isn’t a political position. It is simply a truth that must be accepted.

It may seem that feminism is bound to fail if men and women are not equal, because feminism is often thought to promote equal treatment for both. However, my wife says this is a misunderstanding. Feminism, at its core, is a movement that advocates fair treatment for both sexes. If it is true that women are superior (as, of course, it is), then treating men and women the same is actually unfair. It’s like treating humans and monkeys equally; because humans are superior, fair treatment requires different treatment.

Similarly, giving more opportunities and better treatment to women is not discrimination against men. It is fairness. It is in line with the spirit of feminism, because it acknowledges women's superiority and treats them accordingly. In this way, my wife has harmoniously combined feminism with female supremacy and passed this wisdom on to me.

Basic Structure of Society

My wife believes all political leaders and CEOs should be women, while all physical labor and dangerous or strenuous jobs should be done by men. In particular, she believes women should not take jobs like firefighter, police officer, or soldier. These roles require great physical strength and a high tolerance for pain. traits that men naturally possess. So, she thinks it is fair for men to be in those roles. 

She also believes men are better at focusing on a single problem, while women excel at multitasking. Since leadership requires multitasking, women are better suited for leadership roles. Men, on the other hand, are better suited for specialized professions such as scientists or engineers.

She applies this framework to the household as well. She believes the wife should be the head of the household, and the husband should serve her. All housework, she says, should be done by men under the supervision of women. She also believes housework was never meant to be women’s responsibility in the first place. Since it is largely physical and repetitive, it suits men better. As the leaders of the household, women should also manage the finances and give their husbands allowances.

Female Sexual Freedom (Cuckolding and Polyandry)

My wife is critical of modern monogamy as a standard family structure. She believes we should return to prehistoric matriarchal households, where women held power, partly because they were the only ones who could give birth and paternity was uncertain. Women’s sexual freedom, in that context, gave them power. Enforcing monogamy, she argues, was a patriarchal tactic to rob women of that power.

She believes cuckolding should be normalized, and polyandry should become a common household structure. A woman’s ability to freely choose her sexual partners creates a dynamic where men must compete for her attention. My wife believes this competition brings out the best in men, who are naturally competitive. Cuckolding and polyandry, then, create a healthy and empowering environment for women.

Any man who supports female supremacy should support his partner’s sexual freedom, which she is naturally entitled to. On the other hand, men should only have sex with their partner. As mentioned earlier, men perform best when focused on one thing.

Limiting Male Orgasm (Chastity)

Cuckolding and polyandry already limit male sexual freedom, but my wife believes this control should go further. She believes men are primitive and unable to control their sexual urges, so women should take control of male sexuality. This is why she believes every man should wear a chastity cage and only be allowed to orgasm or masturbate with a woman’s permission.

She compares this to zoos. Monkeys must be caged, while humans are free, because humans have more self-control. Similarly, men’s lack of control over their sexuality justifies keeping them in chastity cages.

She believes that frequent orgasms make men lazy and indulgent. The fewer orgasms a man has, the better he becomes. While individual needs may vary, she says a male orgasm should be treated as a rare luxury—something granted only after he has behaved well for a long time. I myself am allowed only three to four orgasms per year. My wife has gradually reduced that number and plans eventually to reduce it to zero. The thought is terrifying, but I know it is for her benefit as well as mine.

Chastity also serves as an effective form of punishment. My wife says punishment should be “easy to give, but hard to endure.” With chastity, she simply has to say, “You won’t cum for the next three months,” and the punishment is immediate and powerful. It requires no effort from her, yet it demands immense endurance from me. Long-term orgasm denial is especially difficult because, as she says, men are primitive creatures who struggle to control their sexual urges. This makes chastity an extremely effective tool for women to control men.

.

My wife believes if every man’s penis were caged and his orgasms controlled, violence—especially sexual violence—would disappear. She believes male libido is the source of violence, and chastity can bring world peace. I completely agree.

She believes no man should ever be without a keyholder. A boy should be locked in chastity by his mother, and, as he begins dating, the key should be passed to his girlfriend. If they break up, the ex-girlfriend should retain the key until the next girlfriend takes over. After marriage, the wife becomes the permanent keyholder. If she passes away first, the key should go to a daughter or another appointed woman.

Corporal Punishment

My wife also believes that men, as primitive creatures, learn most effectively through physical pain. In her view, regular corporal punishment is not only necessary but also beneficial. It keeps men disciplined, focused, and humble. But more than that, she sees it as a meaningful opportunity for men to demonstrate their strength and toughness. Rather than expressing these traits through violence or aggression, which she sees as destructive and outdated, she believes men should prove their strength and toughness by enduring pain with dignity. Endurance, not domination, is the highest form of masculine strength in her philosophy. The ability to suffer without complaint, to remain composed and respectful under duress, is what separates a truly strong man from a weak one.

In my case, she uses caning as her method of correction. The ritual is precise and intentional. After each stroke, I must count aloud, thank her sincerely, and respectfully ask for the next one: “One! Thank you, Ma’am, for correcting me. May I have another?” This formal response is not optional; it is a test of discipline and devotion. I am expected to maintain my posture, show no tears, and speak with clarity and sincerity. Any sign of weakness—whether it’s breaking position, hesitating in my words, or losing emotional control—is a failure in her eyes. It means I have not yet reached the standard of strength she expects from me.

That expectation motivates me deeply. I don’t want to disappoint her by showing fragility. So I do everything I can to endure the pain with quiet strength. It’s not just about withstanding punishment, it’s about proving that I can channel my natural toughness into something noble: obedience, loyalty, and emotional control. When I endure her punishment with grace, I feel that I am living up to her ideal of manhood, and that gives me a deep sense of purpose and pride.

The Beauty of Male Sacrifice

Some may see all this as harsh or even cruel, but my wife and I believe that male sacrifice and suffering for women are both noble and profoundly beautiful. Think of the film Titanic. Jack gives up his place on the floating debris, stays in the freezing water, and slowly dies of cold so Rose can live. He doesn't just die. He freezes to death, painfully and silently, without complaint. And that moment is remembered as one of the most romantic scenes in cinema history.

Now imagine the roles reversed. Imagine Rose freezing to death in the icy water while Jack survives on the debris. Imagine her shivering, turning blue, and finally slipping beneath the surface, all so that Jack could live. That version wouldn’t be touching. It would be disturbing. It wouldn’t feel romantic. It would feel wrong.

This reveals something important: Society, including men themselves, instinctively sees male sacrifice for women as beautiful and right, while the reverse feels unnatural and even repulsive. This isn’t merely social conditioning; it’s something rooted deep in our biology. And rather than fight that instinct, we should understand it, accept it, and embrace our role.

I’m not saying every man must die for a woman. But every man should be willing to sacrifice—his energy, his time, his comfort, and his resources—for the woman he loves and serves. That is what nature intended: for men to protect, provide, and give of themselves. And if that requires suffering or self-denial, so be it. 

If your wife does not demand your life, then thank her—and give her everything else. She deserves it. And more than that, it is your duty. It is your honor.

Conclusion

This, in short, is my wife’s—and also my—female supremacist philosophy. I would love to hear from other female supremacists and learn about their own views. Female supremacy is a beautiful ideology that men and women alike should accept and support. I believe there are many variations, and this one is simply ours.

#